A final decision on the proposed Station Street upgrade is unlikely to happen any time soon.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
Community concerns about the proposed upgrade have been “escalated” and taken to the state government.
Community group Highlands Matters has raised several concerns about the project and recently met with Wollondilly MP Jai Rowell.
A newsletter sent to the group’s members said it was a productive meeting.
“We escalated the issue to this next level of government because the original grant for the Bowral Bypass was sourced from the NSW government, and because NSW government agencies such as Roads and Maritime Services and Sydney Trains are impacted by the proposed changes to Station Street,” it said.
Group representatives also met with council representatives again last week to express their ongoing issues with the proposal- including parking, heritage and the impact on the the existing landscape.
Councillor Ian Scandrett believes a final decision should not be made until next year.
Since the concept plans were released earlier this year, residents have voiced many concerns in regards to the proposal.
The matter will return to council at the November 22 meeting.
Results from community engagement will be presented and councillors are expected to note the report.
But with any options yet to be presented to councillors for a final decision, Cr Scandrett said more research was needed in light of the results.
“Loud and clear I’m hearing the community feels helpless,” he said.
“I’ve been hearing that for months, that their opinion doesn’t change things.”
The proposed upgrade is estimated to cost about $9.5 million.
Cr Scandrett said a bypass was originally on the table- which will now be stage two- and he questioned whether the proposal was worth the cost.
“I think it’s looking like it’s pretty poor value for money.”
Cr Scandrett said parking and the pin oaks were concerns that were continually raised with him.
Mr Rowell has been contacted for comment but did not respond before the time of publication.