It is a global phenomenon, perhaps currently most conspicuous in the US with the ascendency of Donald Trump in the race for the Presidency, emphasised by the way he has been able to build mounting electoral support from those disillusioned with Washington and Congress, and the inherent corruption of US politics.

Much of the decline in the standing of politics and politicians has occurred as politics and government has become little more than a very short-term “game”. 

A game played by a small political elite, self-absorbed by scoring points on each other, riddled with negativity and opportunism, while looking after the interests of a few, generally at the expense of good government. 

Important issues and policy challenges have been essentially avoided and left to drift, to the detriment of the majority, and the national interest.

So, increasingly, voters feel ignored and isolated from their elected representatives, and the processes of government and politics, almost totally disenfranchised and disillusioned. 

This is compounded as they are fed “spin” rather than facts, rationalisations rather than explanations, politics rather than leadership, problem solving, and effective government directed to their needs and aspirations. 

One question that is constantly put to me is why we can’t achieve bi-partisanship on issues that are clearly in the national interest, especially issues of longer-term significance, where they will clearly remain important well beyond the tenure of our current batch of politicians?

How often have you heard politicians claim to be concerned about the legacy being left to our children, and our children’s children, and so on, only then to see them quickly return to their short-term game playing?

Or, how often have you seem them release an “inter-generational report” only to then see them deliver a budget that completely ignores the challenges of those demographic, climate and other predictions so fundamental to our longer-term national future?

Cynically, in the end, they don’t worry so much as they rationalise their inactivity with the view that these longer-term challenges will probably happen on “somebody else’s watch”, even if their neglect or inertia actually works to compound the magnitude and urgency of the issue.

Yet, the average punter has genuine concerns about basics, such a schools and hospitals, but is also concerned about longer-term challenges such as ageing, climate, infrastructure, NBN, failing manufacturing, NDIS, and so on.

How is it that we can’t develop a bi-partisan national position in support of (say) the big issues, such as child abuse and domestic violence, mental illness and disability, ice and other drug abuse, and a host of nationally significant infrastructure projects such as a very fast train from Melbourne to Brisbane (for which I declare an interest).

An exception is, of course, defence, which seems able to get budget approvals that no other department can get, and then be subjected to less security and less accountability than all other government departments.

Why? Because, broadly, defence spending has bi-partisan support, in the sense that both sides of politics have consistently handled this issue with kid gloves.

Yet, we can see dozens of our best and finest killed in various skirmishes, without a decent justification for our participation in the first place.

I would think now the most important, longer-term, issue is climate change, yet, as we speak, neither side can yet fully explain how we can achieve even a 5 per cent reduction in emissions by 2020, to which both sides are committed, let alone how to achieve the committed targets of a 26-28 per cent reduction by 2030. 

On this, I suspect Shorten will provide some policy detail on climate and the key elements on pricing carbon, which should work to wedge both Turnbull and Joyce, in his seat.

A key issue if the forthcoming election will be climate. Both sides have much to do to win electoral support on this issue. Both will fall short of the mark as to what is required. 

Yet, it should not be a political contest, but rather a bi-partisan position in the national interest.

It will really matter to our children and grandchildren.