News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Wingecarribee Council consider options to cover ongoing shelter losses 

Wingecarribee Council consider options to cover ongoing shelter losses

17 Mar, 2010 04:46 PM
RUNNING at a loss of around $140,000 per year, The Lost Dogs Home has requested additional funding to continue running the Wingecarribee Animal Shelter.

The not-for-profit organisation raised their cost concerns during discussions to renew their tender for the shelter. As a result, Council claim they are legally required to put the matter out for tender.

Lost Dogs Home contracts manager Kevin Apostolides said they had absorbed a loss of close to $700,000 during the five years they have been running the shelter.

He said if Council were to open a tender with the same high standards they would be looking at a cost of more than $200,000 per year.

“The costs, when it comes to certain standards, do not vary from shelter to shelter; maintaining the health and well-being of animals is an expensive exercise,” Mr Apostolides said.

“Yes, you could run a fly-by-the night operation on the cheap but you would be compromising the well-being and condition of the animals.

“The Lost Dogs Home will not compromise our standards, and Council’s standards have always been in line with ours.”

Mr Apostolides said it would be impossible for them to continue under the 2005 arrangement.

“There are many variables to consider, and most of it has to do with making sure the animals get the very best treatment that we can offer to them in that facility,” he said.

“We also have to pay the staff who feed them and keep them clean, and we have a wonderful group of volunteers exercising the animals - if it wasn’t for them the cost would be a hell of a lot more.

“We have to ... break even. That's obviously very difficult. In 2005, no one told me there was going to be a global financial crisis.”

Mr Gordon said because the Lost Dogs Homes have asked to have the original terms of agreement altered, Council has no choice but to re-tender.

“We have got to re-tender otherwise we would be in breach of the tendering regulations and local government act,” Mr Gordon said.

“I would like to stress that Council has no issue with the Lost Dogs Home, just procedurally that’s what we have got to do.”

Mr Apostolides described Council’s stance as “fair and reasonable”.

“If they [Council] decide to go somewhere else than so be it. If they don’t we are more than happy to take it on again,” he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The loss of this invaluable facility would be a disaster to the Southern Highlands. Surely some more, hands on voluntary resources can be extracted from the community at large? As a suggestion, might it not be feasible to join forces with Centrelink (despite the obvious red tape to be waded through) to utilise the services of the high number of fit and able-bodied unemployed, to create an army of people who could pitch in and assist in a wonderful injection of person-power to this challenge? Have no idea of the logistics, but it seems to me that (unless this has already been done) why not:

1. Do the rounds of all the butcher shops to enquire as to the quantities of "throw out meat" suitable for consumption by Highland dogs in need of a feed. 2.Investigate the loan borrow lease donation or procurement of a refrigerated pantech truck, capable of picking it all up on a regular basis.

3. With assistance from Centrelink, determine all the unemployed people who could be given, volunteer status credit with exemption from job-hunting, which are suitably licensed to drive such a vehicle to collect and deliver to the Dog Shelter which would need a cool-room and freezer?


Posted by Mikethepoet, 17/03/2010 11:24:46 AM, on Southern Highland News
Mr Gordon states in the article, "We have to ... break even. That's obviously very difficult. In 2005, no one told me there was going to be a global financial crisis.” I can understand the need to break even, and whilst I am not an economist, I fail to understand what the global financial crisis has to do with the financial crisis facing the Lost Dog's Home. If anything, in tough times, people look to less expensive alternatives and his facility should find things easier, not more difficult, as they are far less expensive than pet stores or breeders. I also happen to know for a fact that the sale of pups through pet stores in this area have not declined in the past few years.
Posted by Ric Einstein, 17/03/2010 1:56:26 PM, on Southern Highland News
Perhaps council could award the contract to a company that saves more of the animals. Lost Dogs Home runs a mega pound in Melbourne where they killed almost 3500 dogs and more than 8000 cats in 2009. http://dogshome.com/statistics

What percentage of the dogs and cats entering Wingecarribee have made it out alive?

Posted by Kelly O'Hara, 17/03/2010 3:31:35 PM, on Southern Highland News
For what it's worth, The Lost Dogs Home posted a $6.3 million surplus in 2009.
Posted by Kelly O'Hara, 17/03/2010 5:04:49 PM, on Southern Highland News
The Dogs Home do great work, I think they do fantastic given the sheer number of animals they see on a day to day basis. Kelly, do you work in animal welfare and if so, please let all the shelters know your secrets to not having to euthanise animals. Otherwise, if you are going to start spouting some 'No Kill', don't bother. I am so sick of hearing that term - all it means is that shelters/group are selective as to what animals they receive and simply shift the euthanasia procedure to another facility.
Posted by Abbey, 17/03/2010 6:15:29 PM, on Southern Highland News
I donate monthly to the home and I am very happy with how their funds are spent. They are in the process of building several new facilities which are going to benefit the lives of animals now and well in to the future. Good on them for being so proactive. Keep up the great work guys.
Posted by Abbey, 18/03/2010 8:30:09 AM, on Southern Highland News
FOR the last 10 years the Lost Dog's Home has killed 70% of the unclaimed dogs and 90% of the unclaimed cats entering their facilities (see www.dogshome.com/statistics). Everyone acknowledges that a low level of euthanasia is inevitable for untreatably ill or irretrievably suffering animals. What taxpayers expect for their money is that every effort will be made to rehome animals before killing them. It is no "secret" how to reduce euthanasia rates, the programs are well known. The Lost Dog's Home refuses to put in place the following basic programs used by shelters around the world to reduce their euthanasia rates: employ full-time qualified animal behaviourists to properly assess impounded animals; work with rescue groups to allow them to take and rehome impounded animals, rather than killing them; establish a foster-care program with members of the public to provide animals with more time to be rehomed; allow volunteers to work with the animals. Given the LDH's refusal to implement any of the above basic programs it's no surprise they have such an appalling euthanasia rate.
Posted by Dog Guy, 18/03/2010 2:51:30 PM, on Southern Highland News
I am President of Friends of the Wingecarribee Animal Shelter Inc., an organisation of volunteers who work closely with LDH and the council. We help re-home a high number of animals finding there way into the Shelter. I resent Ms O"Hara's implication that LDH is a killing machine with no scruples or concern for the welfare of the animals. Our Shelter enjoys a very low euthanasia rate and let me tell you that none of the volunteers would tolerate anything else. I wonder if Ms. O'Hara has ever heard the expression "Don't shoot the messanger". It is not the fault of organisations such as LDH, the RSPCA or Animal Welfare Leage etc. that our society tolerates the over breeding and irresponsible selling on(or giving away) of un-desexed "cute" pets to people who are ignorant and have no concern for the quality of life or indeed death, of millions of dogs and cats in this country each year. For goodness sake, point the finger at "us", a society that treat pets as if commodities. Don't blame those who have to pick up the pieces and are courageous enough to be humane.
Posted by Sarah Hennessy, 18/03/2010 7:27:37 PM, on Southern Highland News
I support the Dogs Home and the only thing I am appalled at is the fact that the wonderful people there and all around this country in other shelters have to deal with pets that have been discarded like a piece of rubbish. Sarah Hennessy, you are so right! Thank you so much for the fantastic work your group does.
Posted by Abbey, 19/03/2010 11:58:04 AM, on Southern Highland News
No-one is criticising the volunteers at the Friends of Wingecarribee Shelter. People are, however, quite entitled to criticise the LDH and their refusal to implement basic rehoming programs such as foster care, employing full-time qualified animal behaviourists and releasing animals to rescue groups for rehoming at their larger facilities. Perhaps Wingecarribee is in a fortunate position and, due to your group's work, the animals at your shelter are spared the fate of animals entering the LDH's other facilities. Take a look at the euthanasia statistics on the LDH's own website http://dogshome.com/statistics. Yes many pet owners and breeders contribute to the problem and everyone is rescue would like these issues to be addressed (despite the apparent reluctance on the part of governments and Councils). But ultimately it is just spin to solely blame these factors for the LDH's euthanasia rates of 70% of unclaimed dogs and 90% of unclaimed cats when they continue to refuse to implement basic rehoming programs. The LDH had over $6 million in the bank at the end of last year so their refusal to follow best-practice procedures is all the more disgraceful.
Posted by Dog Guy, 19/03/2010 4:03:52 PM, on Southern Highland News
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
HOME NEEDED: Every month, Wingecarribee Animal Shelter takes in up to 80 dogs like cute kelpie, Charlotte.Council may have to put more animals down to save on costs. Photo by Alison Balding
HOME NEEDED: Every month, Wingecarribee Animal Shelter takes in up to 80 dogs like cute kelpie, Charlotte.Council may have to put more animals down to save on costs. Photo by Alison Balding
Related Coverage
MULTIMEDIA
17 March, 2010

Most popular articles


ama


Southern Highland News







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...